Call or Text: 612.282.5660

Little Caylee, Little Justice!

What went wrong?

Or did it?

While I discuss this travesty, reflect on why I believe our Courts of Justice are more appropriately characterized as Conflict Resolution Centers.

The travesty I refer to is not that Casey Anthony was acquitted. It was the correct decision for the correct reason. The travesty is that the general public was misled as to the purpose of the trial. Because of this misperception the public outrage was misguided and misdirected.

Before I continue, a caveat: I did not watch the entire trial. Consequently, I don’t know all of the evidence. But I do know the evidence, or lack of evidence, that buttresses my position.

Invariably, people who watched the trial wanted justice for Caylee. And when Casey was acquitted, there was outrage, anger. But justice for Caylee would, at most, be a consequence of a guilty verdict.

The reason for the trial was to hold Casey Anthony responsible for her daughter’s death. But if the trial was a search for the truth, then all must abide by the rules that guide the litigants in their pursuit of justice.

Some of these rules pertain to the presumption of innocence, the burden of proof and evaluation of witness testimony. To better understand the process, it helps to demystify the trial and application of these rules. There are basically three distinct parts to a trial. Jury selection, or ” voir dire” (meaning to speak the truth), allows the attorneys to question each prospective juror in an affort to find bases to have the judge remove an unfavorable juror due to state of mind (“I can’t presume someone charged with killing their child as innocent”)or, by statute, is unable to serve ( a convicted felon). Voir dire also allows the attorneys to properly exercise peremptory challenges ( no requirement that the attorney identify the reason for striking the juror ). At the conclusion of voir dire, the jury is empanelled to hear the evidence.

The next phase-trial-permits each side to present opening statements (what the attorney’s evidence expects to establish-with the observation that a criminal defendant need not present evidence since the defendant is presumed innocent ) followed by the calling of witnesses, beginning with the prosecution. At the conclusion of all the evidence (the prosecution leads with its case-in-chief; then the defense, if it chooses, presents its case-in-chief, followed by the prosecution’s rebuttal and the defense surrebuttal ) and the trial phase ends with final arguments based on the evidence and the agreed-upon law.

The last phase- jury deliberation- occurs during  an indeterminate length of discussion after receiving jury instructions from the judge, which each attorney had reviewed and either  accepted or rejected.

If it can be argued there was a miscarriage of justice, then the blame must be placed at the feet of the prosecutors. Why? Because they chose which charges and evidence to present to the jury. They framed their ” theory ” (legal argument) as murder and lying to the police and their “theme” (factual argument) as ” mother love ” versus ” party girl”.

As an aside, if you watch any criminal trials,  you will often hear the prosecution couch their theme in everyday, common emotions ( greed, love, hate ) that everyone understands. Simple to digest.

The defense, in a stunning revelation, identified their theory as Caylee accidentally drowned, but her death was covered up. In laying out his theory, the defense stated that Casey had been sexually abused. I say this was a stunning disclosure because as a criminal defense attorney for 32 years, I don’t recall ever giving an opening statement that I was not absolutely certain I had the evidence to support it, including having prepared the defendant to testify in his defense.

Why is this so important? Because when you make an opening as the defense did, you do a couple of things you should only do with great caution. First, you assume a burden of proof you don’t have.

Second, you give the prosecution an opportunity to attack the defendant in final argument. Ordinarily, a prosecutor can’t attack the defendant in final argument  because of the presumption of innocence. Now the prosecutor can challenge the defendant’s version of what happened and, in the process, cover up or gloss over the weaknesses in their case. In effect, shift the burden by claiming the defense did not prove what it alleged in its opening statement

So, what went wrong? It certainly was not the fault of the jury. Many legal pundits are quick to blame the jury, unless the verdict is as the pundits believe it should be.  However, this was a consciencious jury that followed the law. It has been disclosed that the jury foreman, alone,  took over 400 pages of notes.

It’s not the judge’s fault. Rarely does a judge inject himself/herself into a trial regarding presenting evidence without an attorney’s objection or invitation. They are loathe to intrude in the area of ” trial strategy.”

It’s not the defense attorney’s fault. He presented an opening that was, supposedly, based on good faith (i.e. he believed the evidence permitted this interpretation).

The fault must lie with the prosecution because, from my perspective, the prosecutors went out on a limb in presenting evidence from an expert that had never been peer-reviewed by others in that field ( odor detected in the car trunk ) to establish Caylee was in the trunk, decomposing. Without peer review, the opinion has not been tested to establish the expert’s credibility. Undoubtedly, the jury was instructed they could consider the expert’s education, the bases for his opinion, what he relied on in drawing his opinion, etc.  

But the most inexcusable mistake must have occurred in the defense’s final argument. Without any evidence in the record, the prosecution allowed the defense to argue that Caylee accidentally drowned. Before final arguments, the judge ruled that the defense could not comment on Casey having been sexually abused. Why? Because no evidence existed in the record. You cannot argue facts outside the record, unless opposing counsel doesn’t object and you can defend your position as grounded in good faith.

Even if the prosecution had not moved before arguments to restrict the defense’s reliance on accidental drowning, they could have objected during final argument that counsel was arguing facts outside the record. Had they objected,  I believe the judge would have sustained the objection and prevented counsel from relying on this argument.

There was no justice for Caylee in the jury’s verdict. Nor will there be. Nobody else will be charged with her death, intentional or otherwise. There was only resolution of a conflict. The prosecution said that Casey killed her daughter; the jury’s verdict said otherwise.

Based on the evidence presented by the prosecutors-and the argument the defense was allowed to make-the jury reached the correct verdicts for the correct reasons. But this begs the question: Where is justice for a little girl who left this world in a garbage bag and may be remembered as a footnote to a controversial  trial?

Little Caylee, little justice!

148 thoughts on “Little Caylee, Little Justice!

  1. the way you connect with your readers through your posts is amazing,be it a video,image or a post, you seem to exactly know what fits in the criteria.beleive me i read 10’s of blogs every week, but your posts are quite engrossing than the rest. I just hope you continue writing and updating this blog!

  2. Not a bad post,in fact really fine.but I really miss that you didn’t express your opinion in detail, but its ok you just have different approach to writing.

  3. Not a bad post,in fact really fine.but I really miss that you didn’t express your opinion in detail, but its ok you just have different approach to writing.

    • Too many people use a blog to grandstand and promote themselves. I use my blog to comment on issues of concern to me. My posts are designed to explain legal concepts without burying the reader in my personal opinion. Usually, I’m not trying to persuade as much as I’m trying to clarify esoteric terms that may even support the reader’s opinion.
      I’m fine with that.
      Thank you for taking the time to read my posts.

  4. i had to go through it again since i could not grab the entire escence of the post in one go.That was a very articulate and logical point you make there.I appreciate you letting me know your thinking on this.

  5. as you may know very well than me these days blogs are cropping up all over the place.most people starting such blogs think,they can write anyway and anything on there blog which is definately not true.but your blog solely stands out for your writing style,it is actually quite engrossing.keep at it.

  6. Outstanding! When something works, just reinforce it,right? Point out how well everything went when they chose a certain action and how if they choose that again they can have a similar result. but i dont understand why the viewpoint changed drastically.

    • There is a well- known truism among trial lawyers. That is, most, if not all, trial lawyers have lost cases they should have won and won cases they should have lost.
      Justice is not a jury delivering a verdict that everyone anticipates and expects. It is both counsel- equally prepared and matched in trial skills-vetting the issues and
      arguing their respective positions with passion and a jury returning a fair and just verdict, regardless of the parties’ expectations.
      Justice is not the domain of any one litigant; it is the jury’s resolution of a conflict reflected in its verdict. Nothing more, nothing less.
      Unfortunately, most people, especially in a high-profile case such as the Casey Anthony trial, read more into the verdict than they should.
      Remember, the jury’s verdict was not that Casey Anthony was innocent; she was not guilty. In other words, the prosecution did not carry its burden of proof on all charges beyond a reasonable doubt.

  7. i tried adding your post to my digg account as i liked it,but seems someone has already submitted this to digg,hence i just voted it. i found it very interesting because of your perception on the subject.

  8. This post is one of those on which an interactive argument can be started as i differ from you on this, but nonetheless great quality post.

  9. Outstanding! When something works, just reinforce it,right? Point out how well everything went when they chose a certain action and how if they choose that again they can have a similar result. but i dont understand why the viewpoint changed drastically.

  10. Gracias!good quality points you high light in this article. I’m not in its entirety together with you, though enjoyed to learn your view point on this subject.

  11. Great review! You actually covered some curious things in your post. I came across it by using Bing and I’ve got to admit that I already subscribed to the RSS, will be following you on my iphone 🙂 btw Plase check my free ipad 2 blog, hope you will find interesting information about free ipad 2 there!

  12. Useful point of view. Thinking what you consider of it’s effects on modern society as a whole though? Periodically aspects such as this start having global expansion and frustration. I’ll check back to check out what you ought to express.

    • I doubt that our English-based, common law jurisprudence will have much effect on “modern society” outside the U.S. Our laws do evolve over time. Witness the multitude of laws that have recently been passed by the federal and state governments, reflecting the proliferation of designer drugs as well as internet-based crimes, to name a few.
      However, you will not see any “evolution” of the basic, bedrock constitutional principles such as the burden of proof and the presumption of innocence.
      I believe the state constitutions that embody these core principles relied on the U.S. Constitution, which reflects our English common law heritage.

  13. I’m thinking Wow, Really, So case closed? I can’t believe there is nothing, no evidence,nothing? Not a finger print? If she [ Calyee] was my daughter, grandaughter. Never would I give up looking for the ”MONSTER” that took my little girls life!

    Impressive writing sir!

  14. Not a bad posting,in actual fact really wonderful one.however I really miss that you diligently didn’t convey thoughts and opinions in depth, however it is ok you simply have distinct way of crafting.

  15. Not a bad write-up,to put it accurately truly great one.nevertheless I actually miss that you just simply didn’t convey thoughts and opinions in greater detail, nonetheless it is ok you simply have dissimilar manner of publishing.

  16. Great review! You actually overviewed some nice news in your post. I came across it by using Google and I’ve got to admit that I already subscribed to the site, will be following you on my iphone 🙂

  17. Great review! You actually touched some interesting news in your post. I came across it by using Google and I’ve got to admit that I already subscribed to the RSS, it’s very great 🙂

  18. Great review! You actually touched some valuable things on your blog. I came across it by using Bing and I’ve got to admit that I already subscribed to the RSS feed, it’s very great 🙂

  19. Great review! You actually covered some curious news on your blog. I came across it by using Google and I’ve got to admit that I already subscribed to the RSS, it’s very great 🙂

  20. your site ranks high on yahoo and i must say your consistent writing style deserves your blog to be such high in rankings.i relished your writing style.keep it up.

  21. GREAT REVIEW! I totally agree with pretty much all you said in your post, especially at the middle of your article. Thank you, this info is very valuable as always. Keep up the good work! You’ve got +1 more reader of your super blog:) Isabella S.

  22. If you really want you can look the other way and not talk about it.but you talked.thanls.Don’t give up your morals for anything. This will lead to a sad and unfulfilling life.

  23. I actually planned to record a thing so as to i appreciate you for a lot of the wonderful information and facts you might be placing here. My personal long term internet exploration provides after the afternoon ended up regarded by using great points and strategies to switch together with my personal site visitors. I would inform you of that the majority of us visitors are generally definitely blessed to stay a useful website with many special those that have valuable essentials. I believe fairly fortunate to have come across all pages and posts and appear to actually a lot more great minutes reading right here. Thanks yet again for those specifics.

  24. If you really want you can look the other way and not talk about it.but you talked.thanls.Don’t give up your morals for anything. This will lead to a sad and unfulfilling life.

  25. Great post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Extremely useful info specifically the last part 🙂 I care for such information much. I was looking for this particular info for a very long time. Thank you and good luck.

  26. This is a different sort of opinion that many people don’t usually talk about. Sometimes I fav stuff like this on Redit. Although this time I’m not sure if this would be best for the users. I’ll look around and find another article that may work.

  27. This is a good subject to talk about. Sometimes I fav stuff like this on Redit. I think this would be the best to submit though. I will be sure to submit something else though.

  28. I’m impressed, I should say. Genuinely rarely do I encounter a weblog that is each educative and entertaining, and let me let you know, you might have hit the nail around the head. Your idea is exceptional; the issue is some thing that not enough people today are speaking intelligently about. I am pretty happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this.

  29. Hello, I accidentaly found your blog!I am trying to get ideas for proper writting style for my own website and what you write definitely gave me some ideas. You have a cool website so keep up the good work!

  30. Great review! You actually overviewed some great things on your blog. I came across it by using Google and I’ve got to admit that I already subscribed to the RSS feed, it’s very great 🙂

  31. Outstanding! When something works, just reinforce it,right? Point out how well everything went when they chose a certain action and how if they choose that again they can have a similar result. but i dont understand why the viewpoint changed drastically.

  32. This post is one of those on which an interactive argument can be started as i differ from you on this, but nonetheless great quality post.

  33. Have you ever wondered who posts some of this stuff that you come across? The internet never used to be like that, recently though it has turned around. What do you think?

  34. as you may know very well than me these days blogs are cropping up all over the place.most people starting such blogs think,they can write anyway and anything on there blog which is definately not true.but your blog solely stands out for your writing style,it is actually quite engrossing.keep at it.

  35. i had to go through it again since i could not grab the entire escence of the post in one go.That was a very articulate and logical point you make there.I appreciate you letting me know your thinking on this.

  36. your site ranks high on yahoo and i must say your consistent writing style deserves your blog to be such high in rankings.i relished your writing style.keep it up.

  37. I study numerous weblogs and i really enjoy your content material. The write-up has seriously peaked my interest. I’m likely to bookmark your web site and keep checking for new info.

  38. Outstanding! When something works, just reinforce it,right? Point out how well everything went when they chose a certain action and how if they choose that again they can have a similar result. but i dont understand why the viewpoint changed drastically.

  39. my thought processes on this subject vary from you.its fine that you brought this up on your weblog,it was a great debatable understand.

  40. Have you ever wondered who posts some of this stuff that you come across? The internet never used to be like that, recently though it has turned around. What do you think?

  41. Honestly i am in two minds on whether to take stand for or against. you are simply sharing your own point,i appreciate it. For some it will ring true for others it may not resemble their experience at all. I’m simply encouraging dialogue in the hope others will get the support they need.

  42. Honestly i am in two minds on whether to take stand for or against. you are simply sharing your own point,i appreciate it. For some it will ring true for others it may not resemble their experience at all. I’m simply encouraging dialogue in the hope others will get the support they need.

  43. my thought processes on this subject vary from you.its fine that you brought this up on your weblog,it was a great debatable understand.

  44. Great points altogether, personally I’m gonna have to bookmark this and come back to it. I’m curious if you have any follow ups to this post?

  45. Not a bad post,in fact really fine.but I really miss that you didn’t express your opinion in detail, but its ok you just have different approach to writing.

  46. Thanks so much for providing individuals with a very special possiblity to check tips from this website. It’s always so brilliant and as well , full of a good time for me personally and my office colleagues to search your website at least 3 times in one week to study the newest guidance you have got. And lastly, I am also at all times fascinated considering the attractive creative ideas served by you. Selected 4 ideas in this post are in reality the most suitable we’ve ever had.

  47. I would like to show my respect for your kindness supporting people that should have help with in this issue. Your real dedication to getting the solution all through turned out to be really useful and have constantly empowered others just like me to attain their endeavors. Your interesting help and advice can mean much to me and still more to my colleagues. Thank you; from everyone of us.

  48. I wish to voice my affection for your kind-heartedness supporting those who must have assistance with this important area of interest. Your special commitment to getting the message all through had become especially insightful and has continuously helped people like me to arrive at their aims. Your interesting key points means this much to me and further more to my office colleagues. Many thanks; from all of us.

  49. Thnx such an abundance of for this! I personally haven’t happened to be the following over joyed by using a blog post for long periods! You are displaying the following, any that implies around posting. Certainly, You might be most definitely somebody that has a problem to speak about that folks need to learn. Keep pace all of the extraordinary position. Continue motivating ghanaians!

  50. Hello there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I’ll appreciate if you continue this in future. Many people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  51. Properly i’m because of Ireland, combined with all over Ireland in europe bono and the lads can be unquestionably popular plus could possibly in no way achieve quite a good deal unsuitable, no doubt you like individuals.

  52. I can see that you are an expert at your field! I am starting a website soon, and your information will be very useful for me.. Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success in your business.

  53. the way you connect with your readers through your posts is amazing,be it a video,image or a post, you seem to exactly know what fits in the criteria.beleive me i read 10’s of blogs every week, but your posts are quite engrossing than the rest. I just hope you continue writing and updating this blog!

  54. Wow, layout do blog excelente! Quanto tempo você tem para blogar? você fazer um blog parecer fácil. A aparência geral do seu site é magnífico, assim como o conteúdo!
    Vimax

  55. I can see that you are an expert in this area. I am starting a website soon, and your information will be very useful for me.. Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success in your business.

  56. Have you ever considered creating an ebook or guest authoring on other blogs? I have a blog based on the same ideas you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my readers would appreciate your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e-mail.

  57. An exciting speech is designer statement. I cerebrate that you should correspond solon on this issue, it might not be a taboo substance but generally fill are not enough to speak on specified topics. To the succeeding. Cheers like your Little Caylee, Little Justice! | Law Tick.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe

With RSS feeds, you don't have to visit our site everyday to keep up-to-date. Simply subscribe to our blog via RSS or Email and our latest posts will come to you!

Meta